Jump to Navigation

R. v. Richards (OCA)

2010 CarswellOnt 8245, 2010 ONCA 728

R. v. Richards

Her Majesty the Queen (Respondent) and Jason Richards (Appellant)

Ontario Court of Appeal

MacFarland J.A., Rouleau J.A., and Sharpe J.A.

Heard: October 28, 2010
Judgment: November 1, 2010
Docket: CA C51629

© Thomson Reuters Canada Limited or its Licensors. All rights reserved.

Counsel: Lorne Sabsay for Appellant

Karen Papadopoulos for Respondent

Subject: Criminal

Criminal law.

Per curiam:

1 The appellant pleaded guilty to a series of related offences that occurred over a period of a week after the complainant informed him that she wished to end their relationship. The offences included a sexual assault, two assaults, an assault with a weapon (a shoe), forcible confinement and two counts of failure to comply with a recognizance.

2 The Crown asked the judge to impose a global sentence of 6 years in addition to pre-sentence custody. The trial judge refused 2 for 1 credit for pre-sentence custody, gave credit on a 1.4 to 1 basis and imposed a series of consecutive sentences resulting in a global sentence of 7 1/2 years and, after giving credit of pre-sentence custody, a net sentence of 6 years and eight months.

3 The sentencing judge did not explain why he was exceeding the Crown submission. He mentioned the totality principle but did not explain its application to these offences and this offender.

4 Section 718.2(c) of the Criminal Code provides that "where consecutive sentences are imposed, the combined sentence should not be unduly long or harsh". In our view, the global sentence imposed manifestly failed to respect the totality principle. While these were serious offences warranting a penitentiary term, the circumstances of the offences and the record of the offender do not take them to the level of a 7 1/2 year sentence.

5 Leave to appeal sentence granted and appeal allowed in accordance with these reasons.

6 In our view, taking into account all the relevant factors, the fit sentence is:

a) to maintain the 4 years before credit for pre-sentence custody for the July 7, 2008 sexual assault;

b) to a substitute a sentence of 12 months consecutive for the unlawful confinement on July 14, 2008;

c) to maintain the other sentences as imposed before credit for pre-sentence custody but to make them all concurrent.

This yields a global sentence of 5 years, to be reduced by 10 months credit for pre-trial custody, yielding a net sentence of 4 years 2 months.

7 Leave to appeal sentence granted and appeal allowed in accordance with these reasons.

END OF DOCUMENT

Tell Us About Your Case

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an lawyer-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close
Office Location

Cohen, Sabsay LLP
357 Bay Street, Suite 901
Toronto, ON M5H 2T7
Phone: 888-626-1102
Fax: 416-364-0083
Map and Directions

The lawyers of Cohen, Sabsay LLP represent clients in Toronto, Ontario, and the GTA, Mississauga, Brampton, Caledon, Markham, Vaughan, King, Whitchurch-Stouffville, Newmarket, Aurora, Richmond Hill, Thornhill, Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, Oakville, Burlington, Milton, Hamilton, Kingston, Ottawa, Frontenac, Peel Region, York Region, Durham Region, Halton Region and Northumberland County.